Blaine's Log, Archives #5 |
|
McCain Actually Won!
Belief of Belief Back of the Class Matinal Madness A Brown Cloud Story My Chair and Armageddon Damn the Stupid Piper! A Dubious Watermark |
back |
|
McCain Actually Won!
As you well know, email has become a conduit for inspirational choir singing. These emails always begin with a long history of forwarding telltales -- all the send-to address lists of previous baton-handers (hint to all you forwarders: you might as well send your friend's email addresses directly to the Central Spam Address Repository). They inevitably end with an exhortation to pass this important message on to everyone you know. Sometimes the directive is more an order, or even a threat. I received one the other day that is basically an ultra-conservative call to arms. It begins with the picture of a gravestone inscribed with:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BORN: July 4, 1776
DIED: Nov. 4, 2008
SUICIDE
It then goes on to quote some arrestingly surprising statistics by Professor Olson from Hamline University School of Law, such as that the number of states won by Democrats was actually only 19, while the Republicans was 29 (not sure why it doesn't even add up to 50), square miles of land won by Democrats was 580,000, while that of Republicans was 2,427,000, and that "In aggregate, the map of the territory Republicans won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country. Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in low income tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."
No need to go on, since -- no surprise here -- after one quick Google, I found that the whole thing is a hoax. Not only that, but unfortunately there really is a Professor Olson and the poor man had nothing to do with it, and has been trying to uncouple himself on the university's website.
So, what's blog-worthy in this? Certainly not the actual bogus email; there's no shortage of rubbish floating around. What strikes me is that long list of previous forwards. I guarantee you that every person who forwarded that email believed what they read. Think about this: people have the capacity to believe random crap that gets thrown at them. The greatest threat to our country, far above terrorists or a staggering economy, is the polarization that has been growing, and seemingly accelerating, over the last couple of decades. The two camps -- the liberals on one side, and the conservatives on the other -- have moved off to opposite corners of the ring and placate themselves by feeding their biases and prejudices to each other. The liberals listen only to John Steward and Al Franken, while the conservatives listen to Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich. People believe this crap because they want to believe it, because it fits nicely into the picture that their corner of the ring is painting around itself.
Communication technology in general, of course, fuels this -- both the internet and the proliferation of media channels. Gone are the days when the majority of our information came through major network or publishing corporations who maintained at least some minimal degree of corroboration. Information now flies around like feathers from an exploded down pillow. There are, obviously, some advantages to this: we're all effectively reporters, and news can no longer be throttled by a few media entities. But, oh boy, is there opportunity for abuse as well. What accountability does the average Joe have if he decides to toss out some convenient political lies? Will his boss at the Home Depot fire him over it? He'd be sued if he did.
The country's founders knew that a democracy's success was dependent on an informed citizenry. That has never been more true than now. With so much misinformation zipping by, only careful, skeptical reason can keep us informed. A little knowledge may be dangerous, but wrong knowledge spells disaster. I've said it before, and I will never probably stop: we have to learn to think for ourselves.
So, this bogus email ends with this:
"If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegals and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years. If you are in favor of this, then by all means, delete this message. If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom."
I say that apathy is listening only to your corner and not making the attempt to get the whole picture.
-Blaine |
|
Belief of Belief
4/5/09
People in the fifties were nuts. Americans suffered from mass hysteria, believing that hordes of communists were infiltrating our borders, subverting the susceptible among us, and would soon be hiding in our closets waiting to kidnap our children to brainwash them in kiddie commie camps.
Now, granted, the world was still smarting from the ravages of WWII when the whole country had spent five years unsure whether goose-stepping Krouts would storm through our towns executing those who still spoke English and forcing us to wear leather shorts. So, their collective nerves were a bit jittery, but the mania that gripped the nation was over the top --arcing so high over the top, it's hard for us now to imagine what in goodness name they were thinking.
In fact, the symptoms were suspiciously consistent: irrational anxiety, delusional suspicion, and, of course, an obsessive desire to form hair into sculptures of duck tails and beehives. Stepping back and applying a critical eye, the causative effect is now obvious. Millions of Americans were suffering from nerve poisoning. And, folks, I've figured out the source of the vile toxin. Think about it; the extensive WWII war factories were starving for products to replace the Sherman Tanks and cool leather bomber flight jackets, and they found it in ... drum roll: plastics. Yes my friends, the fifties saw the blooming of the plastics industry. And guess what? These were SOFT plastics! I remember, because within an hour of getting a plastic toy for my birthday, our dog would get at it and render the little soldier or airplane an unrecognizable blob of goo, not unlike other gooey blobs that she'd produce if not let outside in time.
And we, the wise technologically advanced race of the future, now know what horrors lie in ambush in soft plastics.
I think you see my point.
Maybe you don't. Let me elaborate. We humans are susceptible to mass paranoia. Given half a reason -- hell, a hundredth of a reason -- we frantically jump on whatever fear-wagon that happens by. Louis Pasteur made the world safer by confirming germs as the cause of many dangerous diseases, and then the rest of us leaped off the deep end, concluding against the exasperated sighs of medical scientists,
|
that ALL germs are bad. Every one. Kill them all. Every cleaning product must ensure that it is anti-bacterial. The little bastards.
But now we are finally realizing that not only are our bodies just fine wading through a sea of bacteria, but our systems are designed for it and get confused when not immersed. It's called allergies.
This irresistible draw towards belief in hidden dangers persists so tenaciously against the face of rational evidence that it seems innate. In fact, it is innate. The tendency to assume dangers is hardwired by evolution. A hundred thousand years ago, the rustling in the grass that your ancestor heard might have been just the wind, or it might have been a lion preparing to pounce. Assuming the worst and moving quickly away was relatively harmless if it was just wind, but the opposite -- assuming the least and staying put while the lion readied his attack -- meant your laid-back genes never got a chance to propagate. We're programmed to assume the most dangerous of possible scenarios, but we're also programmed to search out coherent patterns among random information; a facility that allowed us to recognize the location of edible plants doing their best to hide from us. The combination of these two innate proclivities results in an almost irresistible embrace of conspiracies. What served us well in a hunter-gather tribal environment, renders us mad as hatters in the complex and abstract world of today. We're like moths that effectively use the infinitely distant (well, virtually infinite) moon to set a straight course, but end up spiraling in confused circles when encountering a porch light.
Irrational tendencies to believe in unfounded dangers and thus fall easily into conspiracy theories are troublesome enough, but there are forces that have, over the years, learned to capitalize on them -- dark malignancies that manipulate your fears to their advantage -- monsters of the vilest sort that wish only doom and destruction on you!
Uh, sorry about that. I sort of got carried away with my, uh, innate danger sensor.
But seriously, there are those who, not understanding the evolutionary underpinnings, have nevertheless, more or less by trial and error, found that our evolved programming can be exploited. Think about your local news and how they weekly sound the alarm about one silly danger after
|
another -- babies could choke to death on your spatula if it isn't at least twice as wide as their mouth; a vile, cancerous toxin has been found in your drinking water (there are always, always, trace amounts of everything in the universe in everything in the universe). More ominously, though, those in politics have mastered the game to a frightening degree, and I'm not talking irrational fright here. Conservative opinion-shamans manifest liberal tax-and-spend monsters, while liberal woe-be-us-es convince themselves that conservatives are scheming to corral all the money into their pile. And we believe it (at least the camp's half to which we subscribe).
And these are the mild examples. Many lives were ruined by McCarthy and his communist witch hunt, and, more recently, many -- criminally many -- lives were lost, and continue to be lost, because we were so easily convinced that Saddam threatened our world with WMD lions hiding in the bushes.
When Washington cries "Boogie monster!" we have to lie down, take a nap, and then calmly ask them to prove it.
One good thing about evolutionary hard-wiring, though, is that it is egalitarian. We can't shrug it off as just the odd acquired neurotic trait that psychiatry so loves to label and attempt to treat ... and treat ... and treat. We all have it. Every last one of us. There's no curing it, so we don't have to worry about losing our mortgage to therapist bills. There's no pointing a finger and shrugging it off as somebody else's problem. It's the heritage of the entire human race, a reflex that once served us well, but now must be carefully guarded against false alarms.
We must be vigilant skeptics; against the local news and politicians that try to manipulate us, yes, but more urgently we must be skeptical about our own beliefs.
Please, for the sake of us all, don't blithely believe what you believe. Track down the truth.
-Blaine
In memory of the innocent Palestinial lives
lost at the hands of Israel.
|
|
Back of the Class
3/29/09
I have a gripe. I'm not surprised that this doesn't surprise you, but I'm guessing that you're not guessing that this gripe is about a gripe.
Since that may have lacked knife-edge clarity, let me explain. My wife and I were sitting in Starbuck's the other day and I noticed that somebody had spilled coffee on the tile floor, not a large amount, but what might tip out in a moment of inattention. We're talking a couple of tablespoons. Even though a small amount, it could have been slippery on the tile floor, so I was going to wait for my wife to finish her point (and, as usual, it was quite a good one), and then reach down and wipe it up. I was going to use, by the way, a paper napkin the establishment provides for free -- in unrestricted quantities. Before I had a chance, though, a nattily dressed woman walking out announced the situation loudly to the staff and everybody else within thirty feet.
It was her tone that ground my teeth together. This was the voice of indignant
|
accusation, the voice a mother uses when her kids are trying to sneak a cookie. This affluent woman, carrying a Vente-Mocha-Split-Latte-Foofoo prepared and served by cheery people working for pay marginally above minimum-wage, was annoyed that the busy employees had allowed this to fester for, goodness, perhaps as much as a minute.
Well, you can bet I gave her a piece of my mind. And I would have had I possessed a mind that operates that quickly. We're not talking about a failure of compassion here, that has the smell of condescension, but of simple civility. She may be in a position where, through superior skills, inherited advantage, or plain good luck, she has more wealth that the Starbucks' folks, but that should not be confused with superior class. I have very few ideals left about America, but one that I hold close so it doesn't scamper free and get lost in the confusion of scrabbling after the American Dream is that we are a classless society. There are many restaurants and hotels you and I don't go to, but it is our choice that keeps us away, not our social standing. We just don't have that kind of cash to blow.
|
In America, money buys you a big house, a cool car, and great vacations (and maybe a politician or two), but it doesn't buy you class. You earn that by being polite and cordial. Class is making other people a little bit happier without regard to how much money they make an hour.
When I say our, I mean you -- my job is to write up these gripes and try to make you feel a little bit uncomfortable.
-Blaine
For the record and the potential eyes
of future historians, I substantiate (as I
pretty much do every week) that the US
invaded Iraq as an unwarranted aggressor,
and Israel committed unforgivable crimes
in Gaza.
|
|
Matinal Madness
3/22/09
Ten years ago this month, freshly arrived from the east coast, we moved into a rental house. The sun was setting, and I decided that I had just enough time for a quick run to loosen up the joints. The neighborhood was completely unfamiliar, but I had jogged in unfamiliar places many times while traveling with work. My technique is simple: I take off in any random direction until I can't go any farther, then note what street I'm leaving and head off again. I don't even have to remember the name of the street, I just have to recognize it when I come back to it on the return path.
This March evening was glorious -- warm and permeated with heady wafts of jasmine, the ruddy sunset glow backlighting austere arid hills. After twenty minutes, I turned around to repeat the route in reverse. It was getting dark now, but streetlights lit the green rectangular signs at each corner. Very soon -- surprisingly soon -- I came to my first junction, Matinal Street. Shrugging at my humanly inconsistent sense of time and distance, I took the left turn and jogged off into the deepening evening. The terrain seemed unfamiliar, but I knew that perceptions change from day to night. Whereas the first turning point had appeared quickly, my next seemed to have disappeared completely. I was just starting to get seriously worried, when I came to a street that sounded about right. In California, Spanish names are everywhere, and to a Pennsylvania boy, although exotic, they lack sticking power, so that Camino Bernardo, Bernardo Campo, and Casero Bernardo are
|
essentially all the same street. By now, my confidence was about shot, and I peered with nervous anticipation at each passing street sign. Suddenly, I came to Matinal again.
What the hell?
I had apparently somehow circled around and doubled back. I was actually a bit relieved to at least be back on known territory. I took a left again and started to look for another Bandito Casino or some such. And then, as though my childhood devotion to The Twilight Zone was manifesting as a personal episode, I came yet again to Matinal. I stood there as the last bit of light faded from the sky staring dumbly at the sign. My brain was stuck in a tight little loop, "... it's Matinal, but I'm already on Matinal -- it's Matinal, but I'm already...."
Looking more closely, I saw that the first 80% of the six-inch high sign was the word "Matinal" in large, clear letters, and to the right was the block number in quarter-sized font, but just above that, in font about a tenth the size of the main street name, was "CIR". I turned and looked at the other street sign. It also proclaimed an identical Matinal, but its tiny little corner note read, "DR".
There was more than one Matinal!
Oh boy. Now I was totally lost. I had no clue where my new home lay. Further, I didn't even remember the name of the street where I now lived, it being, again, one of those alien Spanish names (Florindo, as it happens). I couldn't even ask for help, other than maybe for shelter for the night.
I staggered around, whimpering and muttering inanely to myself, until, miraculously -- impossibly -- I came upon our car parked along the curb. I had beaten
|
the odds and stumbled by sheer chance on salvation.
After showering and recovering from my fevered delirium born of mental scrambling, I consulted the detailed book-map we had bought. It turns out that there are in fact three streets named Matinal: Matinal Road, Matinal Drive, and Matinal Circle. And, here's the thing; Matinal Drive intersects with both the others at some point -- twice with Matinal Circle. The result is that in our neighborhood, there are three different corners of Matinal and Matinal. Worse, just across I-15, there are four different streets named Mirasol: Drive, Way, Place, and Court, resulting in another three corners of Mirasol and Mirasol.
What do you think was in the minds of the planners thirty-some years ago when Rancho Bernardo was conceived? Apparently not much of any substance. Presumably there were a couple of influential men named Mr. Matinal and Mr. Mirasol who embraced immortality by insisting they ride on 6"x18" fiberglass panels above sidewalks.
I think the lesson here is that not only is it acceptable to question authority, but prudent, essential even. Otherwise, someday you might be standing at the corner of Main Street and Main.
-Blaine PS: Haven't forgotten you, Israel, you bully. |
|
A Brown Cloud Story
3/8/09
When a category four hurricane tumbles into your coastal town, you feel in your bones that even though your house may survive, you're in the middle of a whole lot of grief and loss. On the other hand, a ferocious, raging, fifty-foot high wildfire may be devouring entire blocks of a nearby neighborhood in southern California, but from a few miles away, the hell storm is an oddly shaped and strangely entrancing cloud -- menacing, but in an abstract and disassociated way. You go inside and turn on the TV to see what's going on.
As we stand at the threshold of this downturn1, it feels to me like the California wildfire, or at least it did until last night. The San Diego with which I generally associate is not the manufacturing economies of Ohio and Michigan, but the high-tech R&D of satellite com links and robot drone planes. People I work with are dismayed that half of their retirement savings have evaporated, but their day-to-day lives go on uninterrupted. For them, the piper is waiting down the road for his payment. A few have been laid off, but even for these, although no vacation, their days are spent catching up on home projects they've been putting off and spending an hour or two checking the network feelers for bites. They feel obvious stress that they're living off hard-won savings, but they also don't fear eminent loss of their house (yet). With evident justification, I could shrug and chalk off the true hardship cases to the poor suckers who insisted on living beyond their means.
Last night, though, I listened to a friend of a friend relate that, although some
|
dozens of her colleagues in the pharmacy department of The Major Supermarket in southern California have been let go (I've decided not reveal that it's Vons), because of her thirteen years of tenure, she will simply be moved to a different store. She still has a job. Simple, right? As the late Paul Harvey might have said, "Now for the rest of the story." Her husband died a few years ago, leaving her a single-mother of a little girl in third grade. Her job is not a choice; going to work every day equates to living in her house instead of her car. Her new store is nearly thirty miles away, and, although not the crunching gear-lock of Washington DC, San Diego has its pockets of commuter jam, and her new store happens to lie at the far end of one of the jammiest. So, four out of five days she hustles her little girl out of bed at 5:00 AM so that she can drop her off at a friend's house by 6:00 AM and begin the grueling crawl through fumes and irritated honks. In the evening, she retraces the mind-numbing crawl and retrieves the little girl who has been staying with the same friend since school let out. On the fifth day, she must work a late shift, and doesn't pick up her daughter until after 10:00 PM. Note that the next morning begins another 5:00 AM grind.
This is not the life of the American Dream. This is hell, a hell whose flames flare hotter now that her limited budget is squeezed even tighter by an extra $20/week in gas. Guess where that $9/week tax relief is going for her.
I think about this woman, but I also think about her friend, apparently another single mom. She can't sleep past 5:45 AM herself, and every afternoon and evening (once a week well past bedtime) she is an
|
unpaid caretaker. Nobody's starving or living in fear that the "other" sect will come and burn you out, but there is true sacrifice here that should not go unnoticed.
I fear that things are only going to get worse. Indeed, our leaders admit this, and that alone should set us quaking. For the first time in decades, as a nation we're going to find out what family and friends are really for. For many years, they've been someone to recommend a good movie, or remember to send a cute birthday card. The time is now fast approaching when they will be rolling up their sleeves and reaching out strong hands to keep us from taking up residence in our once-shiny SUVs.
We're all in this together. For those who, for now, stand miles from the brown, entrancing cloud, prepare yourself to reach out that hand to the refugees trickling past your door. Pray that you will have the strength to hold the hand firm as the trickle swells to a flood.
-Blaine PS: I'm waiting, Israel. 1 I wonder if years from now, historians will plot the catastrophic economic sinkholes of the Great Depression and the Downturn. Our great grandchildren will nod, wink knowingly about our children, and remind each other, "Well, you know, they grew up during the Downturn." |
|
My Chair and Armageddon
3/1/09
It all started with a chair. Once a week I run ten miles, just to prove that I can (although I'm going to give it up if people don't resume raising an eyebrow and nodding with admiration -- it's almost as though they've become complacent after three years). Youthful vigor is a tiny hand waving off on the horizon, though, and the day after the Big Run is spent recovering. This last week, however, I spent hours staring into a computer monitor while sweating over a particularly sticky problem, and the chair I was in was nothing more than two perpendicular plane surfaces. The result two days after the Big Run was a slightly stiff back, so that I walked around looking my age. Thus, while I was trimming some particularly nasty briars in the East Province of the jungle that surrounds our house, my lack of flexibility prevented me from giving the lethal thorns due attention and one managed to breach the stratum corneum epidermis1 releasing copious quantities of blood2. I've been putting contacts in and out of my eyes every day for twenty years, and my hands no longer need instructions from my brain, but the bandage on my finger the morning of the third day after the Big Run forced me to improvise the ancient ritual. The clumsy tussle somehow caused the tear duct in my left eye to become infected, and now my vision is watery and blurred. Because of that unyielding chair, I expect to kill, not only myself, but a family of five in an appalling head-on collision.
Although your sympathy would be welcomed, that is not why I related this pitiful tale. You might be thinking that I presented it as a metaphor, but you would be wrong. Oh no. It is an allegory. It
|
illustrates how one thing leads to another, entropy spreading like genetically invigorated crabgrass through the meticulously manicured lawn of life3. The news has been jabbering unceasingly about the economic downturn, and I didn't want to miss the boat with my own hand-wringing warnings.
You see, this last week President Obama proudly announced that he would halve the deficit in four years. That's fine; a trillion dollar deficit is indeed scary. But I fear that some people may confuse deficits and debts. They may have the idea that the President is orchestrating a reduction of the national debt. Oh dear no. He's simply talking about slowing down the enormous escalation of the debt shifted into high gear by Bush. As you would know if you read last week's piece, the current national burden amounts to $75,000 per working adult. Did you also know that the combined debt carried by the American population equals the entire Gross National Product? The financial fate of the nation operates with the same economic gears as the individuals, only many millions of times bigger. Just as so many American families have learned the hard way that you can't live forever, or even for more than a few years, on borrowed money, so, I fear, will our country. Our mind-boggling national debt has been a non-issue these many years for the same reason that these foreclosed families were able to, at least for a while, acquire free money: somebody has been bankrolling the loan, in this case, other countries -- the oil-rich Mideast and China. But what happens when it dawns on them that the whole USA is "upside down"? Hillary has been touring our Uncle Vitos, reminding them that if they pull out now, their whole investment will totally tank. "We're a house of cards soaked in gasoline," I imagine her telling them, "and if
|
you don't continue to pour money on us, we're going to go up like ... well, like a house of cards soaked in gasoline."
The thing is, as the economy continues to nosedive, there will reach a point when so many Americans are jobless, and the rest have finally decided to put away their credit cards and attend shoppers anonymous, that even the foreign sugar daddies will not be able to justify throwing good money after bad. And, boy will that be bad. The feds will be forced to shift the money presses into high gear and not only will we have no jobs, but inflation will take off like ... well, like a house of cards soaked in gasoline that has been lit.
Our savings having evaporated along with the stock market, we'll be either laid-off or working on reduced pay, and meanwhile, everything will cost twice as much each week as the week before. We'll wish we were living back in the good old days of the Great Depression.
So, does all this tie in with my chair and infected tear gland? In retrospect, not really, but, what I can say is that, you know, poop happens.
-Blaine PS: Israel, I'm waiting. 1 I didn't know what the outer skin layer was called either until I consulted Wikipedia. 2 well, you would have thought it was a lot if it was your finger. 3 a point for any nascent writers out there: at least one simile should be used in any contemplative piece, no matter how relevant.4 4 point two for nascent writers: if your piece lacks substantive message, you can distract with a flurry of tangential footnotes. |
|
Damn the Stupid Piper!
2/22/09
I saw the economic meltdown coming. Unfortunately, there were two problems that prevented me from diverting the global crisis:
1) I started predicting it around 1994; so, like the nut who goes around warning that Armageddon is just around the corner,1 without specifics, you have little hope of getting people excited, and
2) who the hell am I? The word "engineer" sort of sounds like "economist," but nobody ever confused the two, and as far as "novelist," well, that's just elaborate lying (hopefully with a viable story arc and characters who Come Alive).
But I did see it coming. My wife and I looked at each other, perplexed, in the late nineties when tech stocks became the gold rush of the new millennium.2 And then again when, as though intoxicated by the failed promise of fabulous riches, everybody (it seemed) turned their wild, greedy eyes to real-estate. Unfortunately, they'd already blown their savings on dot-com fiascos, and so happily -- frantically -- signed charters of servitude known affectionately as "sub-prime mortgages." They bet the farm (or, in this case, the house) on the deluded conviction that real-estate would go up, and up, and up ... forever. When we bought our house here in California in 1999, its value had doubled since our friends had moved here in 1995. Then we watched with bewildered amazement as it doubled under us again over the next half-decade. As long as there were people at the bottom willing to risk ever more desperate opportunities to buy in, the balloon expanded -- what Greenspan called Irrational Exuberance. But wealth (the economic kind, not the Buffet variety) is created by people working at productive tasks, not by shuffling deeds around. The real-estate market in America became one huge Ponzi scheme.
So, now we're in a pickle. We've woken up with our hands shading bloodshot eyes to realize that we've traded our year's
|
supply of food for cases of Tequila, and in our drunken delirium have tipped over all the bottles. Okay, that was a pretty lame metaphor, but I can't afford to waste any.
As we do with every problem that we can't solve using the power tools in our garage, we turn to the federal government (meaning, the President and Congress), and they can do exactly three things: 1) dispatch the Army to blow things up, 2) make laws that the Supreme Court may overturn anyway, and 3) spend money. So, it's spending money. Money it doesn't have. Money it is borrowing.
Um, isn't this sort of how we got into this mess in the first place?
Now, I understand that without the Recovery Stimulus package, the last creaking beams of this rotting economy will surely collapse amid a billowing cloud of starving unemployed dust particles. I'm not saying the feds shouldn't do it.
On second thought, though, maybe I should be. The word recovery means: "a return to a normal state." But, what's normal? Living off maxed-out credit cards? Buying a house twice what we can afford? What if, and this just scares the bejesus out of me, there is nothing to recover to? My wife's mantra since the day we met has been Live Below Your Means, and it is perhaps the most valuable lesson (among a handsome multitude) that I've learned from her. As a nation, however, we have clearly not been practicing this rule. Quite the opposite, apparently. And it's not just the poor suckers who didn't have the sense to do some basic arithmetic when signing up for their new monthly mortgage payments. The very same federal government to whom we run crying for salvation is already in dept to the tune of ten trillion dollars. Do you have any idea how much ten trillion dollars is? If spread evenly across the working population, it comes to $75,000 ($10T / 132M people). That's per working adult. What the hell! How did we get here? On average, we essentially owe everything that we are worth!
|
What if this downturn is not a dip, but a drop? What if it is a correction? The piper must be paid. It may be that, as a nation, we can't afford the lifestyles we've been living. In fact, we couldn't afford them decades ago. Haven't we always been vaguely uneasy about all those over-populated third world countries where the people work for two dollars a day to build all our stuff? Haven't we always had the unspoken suspicion that maybe there was a catch in there somewhere? Were we really all that special that we could make twenty dollars an hour and have all our medical covered, while these poor third-world saps toiled for our benefit?
What if they've just been lending us all this stuff we buy at Walmart?
And the sad part is that it hasn't been all of us who have screwed things up so badly. There are lots of people -- my parents, and probably yours as well -- who have been responsible and prudent. Unfair as it seems, though, we're all going down in the same ship, and the lifeboats have been traded for RVs and 52" plasma TVs.
-Blaine PS: Israel allowed rice into Gaza this last week but not lentils and macaroni, considering them "luxury items." I haven't forgotten you, Israel. 1I admire those nut-packages who tag exact days, and sometimes hours and minutes, for the end of the world. That takes guts. Are they depressed when they don't die at that second? 2 Our astute prescience didn't save us, though, from losing thousands of dollars on Lucent. |
|
A Dubious Watermark
2/15/09
I finished the first draft of a novel this weekend. Somewhere among the last chapters was a word whose importance looms large for me, but few else. I'm only going by the counts that I post on my manuscripts and an average of the size of these weekly pieces, so I can't point to the specific word. But I am reasonably
|
confident it is in there somewhere. This word, slipping off my fingers unnoticed at the time, was the millionth one I've written since shifting this whole writing obsession into high gear six years ago.
I'm tired.
-Blaine |
PS: the record notes that Israel has not proposed reparations for its criminal bloodbath. |